The Full Title For The Musical By Trey Parker - 1351 Words

This Paper Assigned is concerned with a famous new Broadway musical. The full title for the musical is The Book of Mormon. The musical is primarily responsible for satirizing organized religion and commenting on the credibility of the Latter Day Saints Church as depicted in the real Book of Mormon and Mormon religion. The Book of Mormon is conceived and was created by the creators of the famous and controversial animated television show, South Park. The book, lyrics and music for the musical were written by Trey Parker, Robert Lopez and Matt Stone. The music was co-created with Trey Parker, Matt Stone and George Lopez. Parker and Stone have mentioned that they grew up in Colorado. Since they were introduced to The Church of Jesus Christ†¦show more content†¦In 2006, Parker and Stone met Lopez in London where they wrote a few songs for the musical and came up with the basic plot for the musical. After a few years of staging workshops and making changes to the production, the musical started with developmental workshops in 2008. In August 2010, a final workshop took place that lasted for five weeks. The producer for the play – Scott Rudin – wished for the musical to not travel outside of New York City and to open up on Broadway. He pushed everyone by booking the Eugene O’Neill Theatre in New York City. After the key players for the production were cast and construction on the design elements began. The production is co-directed by Casey Nicholaw and Parker. Nicholaw also did the choreography for the production. The following designers were involved with the production: Scott Pask (Set Design), Anna Roth (Costume Design), Brian MacDevitt (Lighting Design) and Brian Ronan (Sound Design). Stephen Oremus was the musical director and vocal arranger for the production. He co-created the orchestrations with Larry Hochman. The Book of Mormon premiered on Broadway on March 24, 2011 at the Eugene O’Neill Theatre in New York City. The production opened right after it opened for previews on February 24. The musical won nine Tony Awards, including the Tony Award for Best Musical. The musical started its first United States National Tour in 2012. Previews for the North American tour began on August 14,

Karl Marx And Max Weber Essay - 1394 Words

Karl Marx and Max Weber are two great sociologists of the 19th century. They have provided varying interpretations of the rise of capitalism, its nature and their ideas on how society changes. Less than half a century separated Weber from Marx. Published in 1867, the twenty-forth chapter of Capital presents Marx’ views on the genesis of capitalism. Weber’s views crystallized in his best-known work – The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism – where he traced the impact of ascetic Protestantism (primarily Calvinism) on the rise of the spirit of capitalism. While Marx’ interpretation was rooted in historical materialism, Weber rooted his in theology. Whereas Marx advocated revolution and transcendence from the capitalist society, Weber assumed that the domination of one human being over another is inevitable and thus, he believed that the system of capitalism should not be challenged. Marx fashioned a theory which emphasized on the regularities that underlie social change and that every society has internal factors that lead to its perishment. He argues that there have been other forms of class societies besides capitalism, where the ruling class lived off the surplus produce of the working class. The capitalist society has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society. It was a complex process by which capitalism developed out of the preceding form of class society. Although one cannot demarcate the lines of transition between feudalism and capitalism, we can certainlyShow MoreRelatedKarl Marx And Max Weber1663 Words   |  7 Pagesnature of the society that we live in. Karl Marx and Max Weber were two world renowned social theorists who both looked at the world in similar and contrasting ways and have helped shape the world that we live in today. Marx and Weber analyzed the transformations of society that resulted in similarities along with differences, explainin g the nature along with causes of the transformation which helps other theorists come up with methods for their claims today. Karl Marx was a German philosopher and revolutionaryRead MoreKarl Marx And Max Weber1486 Words   |  6 PagesBoth Karl Marx and Max Weber assert that capitalism is the dominion of abstractions and the irrational accumulation of abstract wealth for the sake of wealth. For Marx, the state of capitalism is entrenched in the social classes to which people have bben assigned. Capitalism, according to Marx, is a result of the bourgeoisie s ascent to economic and political power. This fuels the manifestation of a system that exploits the labour power of the lower socioeconomic classes for the gain of the higherRead MoreKarl Marx And Max Weber1174 Words   |  5 PagesThe study of sociology has always focused on examining the many factors that compose society and the myriad of ways in which it functions. Karl Marx along with Émile Durkheim and Max Weber were the pioneers that are credited as being the founders of classical sociology. They were the first ones to thoroughly examine the complexities of society and create theories for them. The theoretical frameworks and research methodologies created by these sociologists were products of the enlightenment and areRead MoreKarl Marx And Max Weber1187 Words   |  5 Pages1. Class Karl Marx and Max Weber both identify economic position as being a key factor in social stratification. Marx uses the Materialist Conception of History as his basic premise to show that there exist two classes which are in opposition to one another, and that they are in constant social conflict with one another due to the structure of capitalism itself. Weber, on the other hand, describes class as being an objective measure of wealth, with conflict not between classes but within them. AlthoughRead MoreKarl Marx And Max Weber1156 Words   |  5 Pagesinevitably lead to revolution? Karl Marx (1818-1883) and Max Weber (1864-1920), both social scientists, dedicated much of their time and work towards the common goal of interpreting the causes and effects of capitalism. They did this by creating a sense of understanding (not only for themselves but for others as well) in regards to capitalism’s construction, foundation, mechanism, and its future. In their assessments of capitalism, both Marx and Weber appear to have two different conclusionsRead MoreKarl Marx And Max Weber1324 Words   |  6 PagesKarl Marx and Max Weber were influential sociologists that paved the way for modern sociological school of thought. Both, Karl Marx and Max Weber contributed a lot to the study and foundation of sociology. Without their contributions sociology would not be as prominent as it is today. From the contribution of how sociology should be studied, to how they applied their theories to everyday life has influenced many sociologists. Predominantly, both of these theorist s’ discussed the effects of capitalismRead MoreMax Weber And Karl Marx2003 Words   |  9 Pagesas sociologists and philosophers. Despite a vast amount of sociologists contributing to our development of social thought over time, I’m particularly interested in the work of Max Weber and Karl Marx. Both theorist’s theories co-inside and take on an interesting partial Marxist perspective on society and social thought. Weber, a German sociologist, philosopher and political economist born in 1864 is one of the best philosophers to explain the theory of the economic system of capitalism. He had a wideRead MoreKarl Marx And Max Weber1332 Words   |  6 Pagesdifferent religion in depth that exist on earth and various perspectives of well known people on the study of religion. I chose Karl Marx and Max Weber for my paper assignment. Two sociologists and philosophers have discussed their views on religion and its impact on society. Most of the Sociologist of that time w rote about the role of religion in society, Karl Marx and Max Weber observations are particularly relevant for our course. Religion is one of the principle social ideologies that impacts socialRead MoreKarl Marx And Max Weber2172 Words   |  9 PagesBoth Karl Marx and Max Weber sought to understand the emergence of modern bourgeoisie capitalism and its pervasiveness, at least throughout the western world, in the nineteenth century. Both authors saw modern capitalism as an inherently superior system of economic exchange for the generation of wealth, but greatly differed in their epistemological approach to its genesis. This in turn influenced their loci of analysis, as well as their eventual conclusions on the processes of historical change itselfRead MoreKarl Marx And Max Weber Essay2354 Words   |  10 PagesKarl Marx and Max Weber, were influential social thinkers of the 19th century, having developed many theories in various areas of sociology. One of the areas both Marx and W eber have thoroughly discussed in their essays is origins and development of modern capitalism. Although both theorists agree on the basic elements of modern capitalism, that is, it is a rational process of accumulation of wealth or capital for reinvestment, yet they differ in their ideas concerning how capitalism emerged as it

Sales and Markup free essay sample

oftware retailer uses a markup rate of 40%. If the retailer pays $25 each for computer games sold in its stores, how much do the games sell for? Answer: The markup is 40% of the $25 cost, so the markup is: (0. 40) * ($25) = $10 Then the selling price, being the cost plus markup, is: $25 + $10 = $35 Therefore the games sell for $35. 2) A golf pro shop pays its wholesaler $40 for a certain club, and then sells that club to golfers for $75. What is the retail markup rate? Answer: The gross profit in dollars is calculated as sales price less cost: $75 $40 = $35 The markup rate is then calculated: Markup (%) = Gross Profit / Cost *100 = $35 / $40 *100 = 87. 5% 3) A shoe store uses a 40% markup on cost. Find the cost of a pair of shoes that sells for $63. Answer: The cost of the shoes is calculated as follows: Selling Price = Cost + Markup ($) = Cost + (Markup (%) * Cost) $63 = Cost + (40% * Cost) $63 = Cost + (0. 4 * Cost) $63 = (1 + 0. 4) * Cost $63 = 1. 4 * Cost Cost = $63 / 1. 4 = $45 ) In 2009, Donna Manufacturing sold 100,000 widgets for $5 each, with a cost of goods sold of . We will write a custom essay sample on Sales and Markup or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page What is the company’s margin %? Identify a way that Donna Manufacturing can increase its profit margin? Answer: First we have to calculate the gross profit: Gross Profit = Selling Price – Cost of Goods Sold = $5 $2 = $3 Now we can calculate the margin: Margin (%) = Gross Profit / Sales * 100 = $3 / $5 * 100 = 60% Ways to increase the profit margin: Decrease cost of material Decrease cost of manufacturing Increase sales price per unit Decrease COGS )

Hobbes Philosophy Essay Example For Students

Hobbes Philosophy Essay Born during a period of medieval philosophy, Thomas Hobbes developed a new way of thinking. He perfected his moral and political theories in his controversial book Leviathan, written in 1651. In his introduction, Hobbes describes the state of nature as an organism analogous to a large person (p.42). He advises that people should look into themselves to see the nature of humanity. In his quote, The passions that incline men to peace, are fear of death; desire of such things as are necessary to commodious living; and a hope by their industry to obtain them, Hobbes view of the motivations for moral behavior becomes valid because of his use of examples to support his theories, which in turn, apply to Pojmans five purposes for morality. We will write a custom essay on Hobbes Philosophy specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now Hobbes purpose to his state of nature philosophy was to describe human nature. He argues that, in the absence of social condition, every action we perform, no matter how charitable or benevolent, is done for reasons which are ultimately self-serving (p.43-47). For example, if I were to donate to charity, I am actually taking delight in demonstrating my power. Hobbes believes that any account of human action, including morality, must be consistent with the fact that we are all self-serving. His theory notes that humans are essentially equal, both mentally and physically, so that even the weakest person has the strength to kill the strongest (p.44). Given our equal standing, Hobbes believes that there are three natural causes of quarrel among people: competition for limited supplies of material possessions, distrust of one another, and glory so that people remain hostile to preserve their reputation. With these natural causes of quarrel, Hobbes concludes that the natural condition of h umans is a state of perpetual war of all against all, where no morality exists, and everyone lives in constant fear (p.45). He believes that humans have three motivations for ending this state of war: the fear of death, the desire to have an adequate living and the hope to attain this through ones labor (p.47). These beliefs become valid because of the use of his examples. One example suggests that people are barbaric to each other. With the absence of international law, strong countries prey on the weakness of weak countries. I believe that his views of moral behavior are very true. Like Hobbes said, people are out for their well-being. If I were to do a favor for someone, I may think I am helping someone out, which I am, but I am probably doing the favor because it is going to make me feel better. It is going to benefit my well being. Hobbes is a famous philosopher whose views were very controversial. But the fact that he lived in a time when the monarchy was the divine right of k ings (p.42), makes his views valid today. With a different government and new laws, his views appear to be true. In the book, The Moral Life, Louis Pojman discusses the need for moral code. To make his point clear, he takes a look at the novel, Lord of the Flies, by William Golding. Lord of the Flies is a modern allegory on the nature and purpose of morality. A group of British private school boys are marooned on an island; detached from the constraints of civilization, they turn into savages. The significance of the book lies in the fact that it illuminates the need for and purpose of ethical codes (5). The theme of the book is an attempt to trace the defects of society back to the defects of human nature. Pojman believes that the fundamental ambiguity of human existence is seen throughout the book, mirroring the human condition (35). Hobbes gives a classic reply to the book. Similar to Pojmans beliefs, he believes that human beings always act out of perceived self-interest; they invariably seek gratification and avoid harm. Given a state of insecurity, people have reason to fear one another. This state of nature is one in which there are no common ways of life, no laws or moral codes and no justice or injustice. .ue8173903711520bfee257d4ddaf8c918 , .ue8173903711520bfee257d4ddaf8c918 .postImageUrl , .ue8173903711520bfee257d4ddaf8c918 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ue8173903711520bfee257d4ddaf8c918 , .ue8173903711520bfee257d4ddaf8c918:hover , .ue8173903711520bfee257d4ddaf8c918:visited , .ue8173903711520bfee257d4ddaf8c918:active { border:0!important; } .ue8173903711520bfee257d4ddaf8c918 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ue8173903711520bfee257d4ddaf8c918 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ue8173903711520bfee257d4ddaf8c918:active , .ue8173903711520bfee257d4ddaf8c918:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ue8173903711520bfee257d4ddaf8c918 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ue8173903711520bfee257d4ddaf8c918 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ue8173903711520bfee257d4ddaf8c918 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ue8173903711520bfee257d4ddaf8c918 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ue8173903711520bfee257d4ddaf8c918:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ue8173903711520bfee257d4ddaf8c918 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ue8173903711520bfee257d4ddaf8c918 .ue8173903711520bfee257d4ddaf8c918-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ue8173903711520bfee257d4ddaf8c918:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Message In A Bottle EssayThe answers to the lack of moral codes are to implement laws. Much like Hobbes, Louis Pojmans view also is based upon rules. Pojman believes that morality consists of a set of rules, which, if followed by nearly everyone, will promote the flourishing of nearly everyone. He developed a set of five rules that restrict our freedom but only in order to promote greater freedom: To keep society from falling apart, to ameliorate human suffering, to promote human flourishing, to resolve conflicts of interest in just and orderly ways, and to assign praise and blame, reward the good and punish the guilty. (p.39). Pojman believes that we can all do better if we compromise, give up some of our natural liberty so that we will all be more likely to get what we want: security, happiness, power, and peace. Hobbes answer to the lack of moral code is in accordance with Pojmans five purposes. They both believe that society needs moral rules to guide everyones actions. With moral rules society wouldnt fall apart as in Hobbes example. Hobbes and Pojman think that although these rules restrict our freedom, they will help promote greater freedom and well-being. While both Hobbes and Pojmans ideas are similar, they are not identical. Different moral theories emphasize different purposes and in different ways. While Pojmans ideas emphasize society need for moral rule, Hobbes ideas accent the role of resolving conflicts of interest. Morality is a necessary condition for happiness. It enables us to reach our goals in socially acceptable ways. It allows us to resolve conflicts of interests fairly. But the one thing true in both of their views is that un til the state of war ends, each person has a right to everything, including another persons life.